Low-tech Magazine

How (not) to resolve the energy crisis

Increasing the share of renewable energy will not make us any less dependent on fossil fuels as long as total energy consumption keeps rising. Renewable energy sources do not replace coal, oil or gas plants, they only meet (part of) the growing demand. 

Carbon sequestration: bury the idea, not the CO2

Why introduce yet another expensive, energy-intensive and risky technology if there are so many other and better ways of fighting global warming? 

Capturing CO2 from the smokestacks of power stations with the intention of storing it in underground reservoirs, oceans, rocks, consumer products, chemicals or fuels has gained a lot of credibility recently. Many experts believe that we will burn the world's remaining fossil fuels anyway, and we should therefore try to lower the impact if we are to prevent a catastrophic climate change. Yet capturing, transporting and storing carbon dioxide raises energy consumption considerably and brings with it serious health and environmental problems. The benefits, on the other hand, are shadowed in doubt.

The world's factory hall

Almost 30 percent of energy use and 35 percent of CO2-emissions in China comes from the production of export goods.

China and India are devouring our energy resources at an ever faster pace. The greenhouse gases that are saved in western countries by installing windmills and solar panels are abundantly compensated for by the building of new coal plants in these countries. However, we don’t have clean hands.