« Lost knowledge: ropes and knots | Main | Piston-powered aircraft from the 1950s were as fuel-efficient as the current average jet »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Pacman

(1)

Why not make it a simple wiki? Everyone already knows how to use it and it works well.

Kris De Decker

(2)

Yes, I was also thinking about that. But if I understand it well it seems that they prefer to work with (paid?) experts only.

Kris De Decker

(3)

"This bears all the hallmarks of a well-intentioned project that will grind slowly to a halt. Like flowers that wilt when cut and put in a vase, indigenous knowledge tends to degrade quickly when removed from its context."

See: http://www.doorsofperception.com/archives/2010/07/post_55.php

rangarao

(4)

hand spinning is one of the oldest arts. anyone who practices daily spinning will acquire a built-in proficiency in any activity involving manual operations. as an example a good spinner will become an expert welder within no time. the coordination between mind and muscles will improve.

m

(5)

Flash sucks. Why not do it in simple HTML or a wiki as suggested above?

Eden Rock

(6)

The Barefoot Architect is a great start, for a hard copy of info. Seems mostly out of South America, but lots of great stuff for building, water filtration, and whatnot.

Aslak

(7)

Animals (horses, bulls, donkeys etc.) and muscle powered machines like hoisting machines are missing.

Someone

(8)

Too bad, UNESCO is only building a mausoleum for all that knowledge.
I will write them about the Wikipedia...

Wayland

(9)

This sort of preservation is a must in today's work place.
Now if only we could get the younger generation to bring some of these skills back to the field to help them improve their craftsmanship .

Morten Skogly

(10)

The site is already offline.

T. Rick

(11)

would love to subscribe for updates on this project, any help in doing that, vastly appreciated.
Toby... mesagoat [at] gmail [dot] com

anon

(12)

this project (which seems to be dead) just sounds and smells like one more half-baked attempt to grab or eat public funding... especially europe is chock full of this style of corrupt use of funds. Someone above suggested why wouldnt this be handled by a simple wiki.. indeed, a simple wiki would have gotten the job done without any need for an 'institute' or funding for it... and if theres no way we can spend money on it, then we aint doing it!
better to not expect anything ever t come from centrally organized or funded projects. people doing things for themselves is the only way we will get anything done.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)